Quantcast
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pin It

Viggo Mortensen Thinks Peter Jackson Uses Too Much CGI

Posted by:

Posted by: Staff
created 05/16/2014 - 5:42pm

Body

15432

Seems Viggo Mortensen isn't a big fan of digital effects in movies, or at least the overuse of them, as it sounds as if he isn't too thrilled with The Hobbit movies.

Of course, Mortensen played Aragorn for Peter Jackson in the Lord Of The Rings, and he even says the sequels for LOTR even started to get out of control.

Here is what he had to say about it to The Telegraph:

Peter was always a geek in terms of technology but, once he had the means to do it, and the evolution of the technology really took off, he never looked back. In the first movie, yes, there’s Rivendell, and Mordor, but there’s sort of an organic quality to it, actors acting with each other, and real landscapes; it’s grittier. The second movie already started ballooning, for my taste, and then by the third one, there were a lot of special effects. It was grandiose, and all that, but whatever was subtle, in the first movie, gradually got lost in the second and third. Now with The Hobbit, one and two, it’s like that to the power of 10.

I guess Peter became like Ridley Scott – this one-man industry now, with all these people depending on him. But you can make a choice, I think. I asked Ridley when I worked with him (on 1997’s GI Jane), 'Why don’t you do another film like The Duellists [Scott’s 1977 debut, from a Joseph Conrad short story]?’ And Peter, I was sure he would do another intimately scaled film like Heavenly Creatures, maybe with this project about New Zealanders in the First World War he wanted to make. But then he did King Kong. And then he did The Lovely Bones – and I thought that would be his smaller movie. But the problem is, he did it on a $90 million budget. That should have been a $15 million movie. The special effects thing, the genie, was out of the bottle, and it has him. And he’s happy, I think…”

 
 

Comments

Facebook Twitter Tumblr Google Plus rss feed